People v. Bradford CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted Michael Bradford of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code,
§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) and robbery (Pen. Code, § 211).1 The jury also found true
allegations Bradford committed these crimes for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in
association with a criminal street gang (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) The trial
court sentenced Bradford to 15 years in state prison.
Bradford appeals, contending we must reverse his conviction because the trial
court prejudicially erred by failing to exclude his statements to police detectives and
certain gang expert testimony. He additionally contends there was insufficient evidence
to support his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon under the natural and probable
consequences doctrine, and the accumulation of the trial court's errors deprived him of a
fair trial. We are not persuaded by Bradford's contentions and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
Bradford, James Williams, and Dorian Larkin attacked an 18-year-old man,
robbed him of his backpack and cell phone, and then fled in a car driven by Bradford.