Melcher

Melcher v. Armstrong CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2015B255470California6,545 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/4/15 Melcher v. Armstrong CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALAN MELCHER et al., B255470

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC099216) v.

RONALD ARMSTRONG et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank Johnson, Judge. Affirmed.

Lieber Williams & Labin, Stanley P. Lieber and Kathy Belous for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Golden • Kopcke and David B. Golden for Defendants and Respondents. Alan Melcher (Melcher) and M3Travel (appellants)1 appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend a demurrer filed by respondents Ronald Armstrong, Padma Armstrong, and GT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.