Cristobal Acevedo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
595 F. App'x 729
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 201511-72584, 12-70646California505 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Cristobal Acevedo petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision (1) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order finding that Acevedo is removable and ineligible for cancellation of removal based on his conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(2), which •is categorically an aggravated felony and (2) denying Acevedo’s motion to reopen or reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petitions.

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(B), an aggravated felony is defined as “illicit trafficking in a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21), including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in section 924(c) of Title 18).” There are “two possible routes [under § 1101(a)(43)(B) ] to qualify as an aggravated felony.” Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 974 (9th Cir.2008). A person can commit an aggravated felony (1) under the phrase “illicit trafficking in a controlled substance,” if the underlying crime “contains a trafficking element” or (2) under the phrase “drug trafficking crime[,] ... if it would be punishable as a felony under the federal drug laws.” Id. A “drug trafficking crime,” defined under 18 U.S.C. § 924…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.