Dickson

Dickson v. Burke Williams, Inc.

Good Law
184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 774·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 209·234 Cal. App. 4th 1307·126 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 824
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2015B253154California4,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Burke Williams, Inc. (defendant), appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent Domaniqueca Dickson (plaintiff) on her claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) for failure to take reasonable steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment or discrimination (§ 12940, subd. (k)), and the trial court’s denial of its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV motion). Defendant also appeals from the award of punitive damages.

In reversing the judgment, we hold there cannot be a valid claim for failure to take reasonable steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment if, as here, the jury finds that the sexual harassment that occurred was not sufficiently severe or pervasive as to result in liability. A claim for failure to take reasonable steps necessary to prevent sexual harassment cannot prevail when the necessary element of sexual harassment is not established. Similarly, the jury’s finding that defendant was not liable on plaintiff’s sex discrimination claim because there was no adverse employment action precludes defendant’s liability for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.