Redlich

Redlich v. Reliance Management Group CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 2015A140313California3,854 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

BACKGROUND

Redlich contracted with Vox, a design firm, and Reliance, a construction management firm, to renovate a Hillsborough, California residence. Paragraph 15 of the Vox contract, in the same font as used in most of the rest of the contract, reads: “15. Arbitration. Any controversy relating to the Contract shall be submitted to and settled by binding arbitration in accordance with rules of American Arbitration Association. Arbitrator shall have a minimum of eight years of

1 All further statutory references are to the Business and Professions Code unless indicated.

1 practical design or construction experience. Legal or forensic experience shall not be considered practical construction experience. A hearing on the matter to be arbitrated shall take place in the State and County where the Parties signed the Contract or in a mutually agreeable location. . . . . If a demand for arbitration is tendered by either party to the Contract, the demanding party will prepare and deliver to the other Party or Parties the following: a complete list of alleged claims, all expert reports, all costs to recover, and all supporting documentation no later than sixty (60) days prior to the date…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.