People v. DeShields CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/13/15 P. v. DeShields CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COPY
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C070131
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F02689)
v.
ROBERT DESHIELDS,
Defendant and Appellant.
A Chihuahua survived strangulation and anal penetration. A jury found defendant Robert DeShields guilty of animal cruelty (Pen. Code, §§ 597, subd. (b); undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code) but was unable to reach a verdict on a count of sexual assault of the dog for purposes of arousing or gratifying defendant’s sexual desire (§ 286.5). On appeal, defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in (1) allowing evidence of prior conduct to show a plan or design of…