People v. DeShields CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2015C070131California4,910 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/13/15 P. v. DeShields CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COPY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C070131

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11F02689)

v.

ROBERT DESHIELDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

A Chihuahua survived strangulation and anal penetration. A jury found defendant Robert DeShields guilty of animal cruelty (Pen. Code, §§ 597, subd. (b); undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code) but was unable to reach a verdict on a count of sexual assault of the dog for purposes of arousing or gratifying defendant’s sexual desire (§ 286.5). On appeal, defendant contends the trial court abused its discretion in (1) allowing evidence of prior conduct to show a plan or design of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.