Alejandro Oros-Franco v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
597 F. App'x 434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 201511-71266California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alejandro Oros-Franco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s April 5, 2011, reinstatement of his 1989 deportation order. This Court has jurisdiction over the petition under the Immigration and Nationality Act as amended. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Although we review legal questions de novo, our review of a reinstatement order is otherwise “limited to confirming the agency’s compliance with the reinstatement regulations.” Garcia de Rincon v. DHS, 539 F.3d 1133, 1136-37 (9th Cir.2008).

Oros-Franco contends that the reinstatement order was not properly executed. Oros-Franco’s argument that the order was not properly executed is without merit. He provides no evidence that would overcome the presumption of regularity applied to the official acts of public officers. See United States v. Navarro-Vargas, 408 F.3d 1184, 1207 (9th Cir.2005); see also Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 484, 496 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc) (“Morales points to no material errors in his file; nor does he explain what evidence he would have presented, had he been given the opportunity to do so.”)

He next seeks to challenge his underlying 1989…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.