Shokohi
Shokohi v. Wells Fargo Bank CA1/1
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/13/15 Shokohi v. Wells Fargo Bank CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
EMIL SHOKOHI,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
A141708
v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG13676587) Defendants and Respondents.
Emil Shokohi filed this lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank and two of its employees1 after losing an earlier suit involving the same defendants. The trial court granted Wells Fargo’s special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP2 motion) after it found that Shokohi’s claims arose from defendants’ litigation activity in the earlier case and that Shokohi was unlikely to prevail on them. Shokohi appeals, but we affirm.