People v. Andreas CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2015C076463California2,806 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/17/15 P. v. Andreas CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076463

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CM040481)

v.

PHILIP MARK ANDREAS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Sentenced to the upper term in state prison following a plea agreement, defendant Philip Mark Andreas contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion by applying improper aggravating factors and failing to consider mitigating factors, and (2) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the court’s reliance on improper aggravating factors. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A felony complaint filed January 29, 2014, charged defendant with stalking (counts 1 & 2; Pen. Code, §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.