People v. Watkins CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2015C076495California614 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/17/15 P. v. Watkins CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C076495

v. (Super. Ct. No. SF125404A)

MARCIST RASHAWN WATKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Marcist Rashawn Watkins asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we will affirm the judgment. I Matthew Franklin was in his driveway waiting to go to school when he saw defendant riding a bicycle. Franklin knew defendant from the neighborhood; he never had any problems…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.