United States v. Jose Espinoza-Ventura

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201514-10329California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-10329

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00402-KJD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSE ESPINOZA-VENTURA, a.k.a. Alfredo Ernesto-Ramirez, a.k.a. Jesus Jose Tobar,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 10, 2015**

Before: FARRIS, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Espinoza-Ventura appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of

U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.