People v. Rupp CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal but invited this

court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.

Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as a possible but not

arguable issues (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Rupp's request

for a grant of probation with a referral to drug court; and (2) whether the record on appeal

supports a claim that Rupp received ineffective assistance of counsel as to the

consequences of her plea.

After we received counsel's brief, we gave Rupp an opportunity to file a

supplemental brief, but Rupp did not respond.

A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issue suggested by counsel, has disclosed no

3 reasonably arguable appellate issue. Rupp has been adequately represented by counsel

on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

IRION, J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.

4