People v. Vanleer CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 20, 2015C074243California2,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/20/15 P. v. Vanleer CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C074243

v. (Super. Ct. No. CM034214)

KARLENE VANLEER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Karlene Vanleer appeals from the trial court’s denial of her request to reinstate drug diversion under Penal Code section 1000.1 She claims the court relied on evidence from a search of her car that was obtained in violation of her Fourth Amendment rights and the evidence should have been suppressed. We conclude the car search was unlawful because defendant’s section 1000 status did not include a

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 requirement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.