People v. Hill CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies

"It is well settled that inmates must exhaust available administrative remedies

before filing a petition for habeas corpus in the courts." (In re Hudson (2006) 143

Cal.App.4th 1, 7, citing In re Muszalski (1975) 52 Cal.App.3d 500, 508.)1 A parolee,

Although the " 'doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies' " is not entirely inflexible, Hill does not assert and we do not find that any of the usual exceptions apply in this case. (In re Hudson, supra, 143 Cal.App.4th at p. 7; Ogo Associates v. City of Torrance (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 830, 834 ["It contains its own exceptions, as when the subject matter of the controversy lies outside the administrative agency's jurisdiction [citation], when pursuit of an administrative remedy would result in irreparable harm [citations], when the administrative agency cannot grant an adequate remedy [citations], 3 dissatisfied with his parole conditions, can challenge those conditions by an

administrative review. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, §§ 3084.1-3084.3, 3084.8-3084.

[describing appeal process for inmates and parolees with grievances].) He can also

request…