Plumer
Plumer v. Rigdon CA4/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 2015D066249California2,343 words
Opinion
Opinion
Mcintyre, J.
Filed 3/23/15 Plumer v. Rigdon CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CAROL PLUMER, D066249
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00058926
CU-PO-NC)
REBECCA RIGDON et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,
Jacqueline M. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.
Michael G. Harris for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Wallace, Brown & Schwartz, George M. Wallace, Jr. and Lisa J. Brown for
Defendants and Respondents.
Plaintiff Carol Plumer appeals after the trial court entered summary
judgment in favor of Rebecca Rigdon and Rigdon Dressage (together Defendants)
on her negligence claim against them. We affirm.