Plumer

Plumer v. Rigdon CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 2015D066249California2,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

Filed 3/23/15 Plumer v. Rigdon CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL PLUMER, D066249

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00058926

CU-PO-NC)

REBECCA RIGDON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Jacqueline M. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.

Michael G. Harris for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Wallace, Brown & Schwartz, George M. Wallace, Jr. and Lisa J. Brown for

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Carol Plumer appeals after the trial court entered summary

judgment in favor of Rebecca Rigdon and Rigdon Dressage (together Defendants)

on her negligence claim against them. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.