Shames

Shames v. Peffer CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2015D065737California3,274 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

Filed 3/25/15 Shames v. Peffer CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SHAMES, D065737

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00036966-

CU-DF-CTL)

DAVID PEFFER et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Michael Shames, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Aguirre & Sevenson and Maria C. Severson for Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Michael Shames appeals from orders awarding attorney fees to

defendants David Peffer and Michael Aguirre after they prevailed in special motions to strike brought under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civ. Proc., § 425.16).1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.