Knight

Knight v. Rainstorm Pictures CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2015B253246California5,653 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/25/15 Knight v. Rainstorm Pictures CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ANTHONY LOMBARD-KNIGHT et al., B253246

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS143076) v.

RAINSTORM PICTURES, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm H. Mackey, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Jonathan W. Birdt and Jonathan W. Birdt for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Scott A. Meehan for Defendant and Respondent. __________________________________________ This appeal involves two agreements to finance the production of motion pictures. Each agreement contained a clause to arbitrate disputes under the rules of a private provider, Judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.