United States v. Alejandro Garcia-Jacobo

Good Law
599 F. App'x 669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 201514-50207California269 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Alejandro Garcia-Jacobo appeals the district court’s 24-month sentence imposed for a violation of the terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing for plain error, Henderson v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1121, 1124-25 , 185 L.Ed.2d 85 (2013), we affirm.

Garcia-Jacobo argues that the sentence imposed as a result of his violation of supervised release must be vacated in light of United States v. Aguilera-Rios, 769 F.3d 626 (9th Cir.2014), which was decided after he was sentenced, on the ground that his substantial rights were violated. Even assuming, without deciding, that Garcia-Jacobo can challenge a procedural error that occurred at a prior sentencing hearing, his claim nevertheless fails because he has not shown a reasonable probability that the district court would have imposed a lower sentence. First, there is no dispute that the district court imposed a sen tence that was within the correct sentencing guidelines range for a violation of the terms of supervised release. Second, while the district court did state that it “considered the underlying range for the underlying conviction,” the court made it clear that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.