Ragab Rezek v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
599 F. App'x 663
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 201511-71497California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ragab Mohamed Rezek, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) final order dismissing his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his asylum application as time-barred. The IJ found that Rezek failed to establish extraordinary circumstances for filing his asylum application approximately 16 months after the one-year deadline. But the IJ did grant Rezek’s request for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition to review the asylum application as time-barred under the one-year rule.

The BIA did not err in determining that Rezek did not qualify for the extraordinary circumstances exception to the one-year bar under the circumstances of this case. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(2)(B). Neither Re-zek’s pending adjustment application nor his reliance on his wife’s representation that she could help him remain in the United States qualified for the exception. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.4 (a)(5). Further, Re-zek’s pursuit of adjustment of status was not directly related to his failure to meet the filing deadline as he could have pursued asylum and adjustment of status concurrently. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.