People v. Bergo CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2015C076080California1,169 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/26/15 P. v. Bergo CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Amador) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076080

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 11-CR-18010)

v.

JUSTIN BRYAN BERGO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Justin Bryan Bergo appeals from the postconviction order of the trial court that he reimburse the county for the services of appointed counsel in a criminal prosecution. (Pen. Code, § 987.8.)1 Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has briefed no

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 issues and asks this court to review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).2 Finding no error, we shall affirm.

In accordance with People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.