Wheeler

Wheeler v. Trimble CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2015F068696California1,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

I. Standard of Review

“A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint, and the granting of leave to amend involves the trial court’s discretion. Therefore, an appellate court employs two separate standards of review on appeal. [Citations.] First, the complaint is reviewed de

Although petitioner repeatedly refers to the section as “section 3084.6, subdivision (h)(2)(A),” it is clear from the copies of the regulation attached to his original and amended petitions that he is actually relying on section 3084.5, former subdivision (h)(2)(A). 3 novo to determine whether it contains sufficient facts to state a cause of action. [Citation.] In doing so, we accept as true the properly pleaded material factual allegations of the complaint, together with facts that may be properly judicially noticed. Reversible error exists only if facts were alleged showing entitlement to relief under any possible legal theory. [Citations.] [¶] Second, where the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend, reviewing courts determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in doing so. [Citations.] On review of the trial court’s refusal to grant leave to amend, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.