People v. Yost CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 2015E062026California129 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Defendant appealed and, upon her request, this court appointed counsel to

represent her. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the

case and no arguable issues. Counsel has also requested this court to undertake a review

of the entire record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which

she has not done.

Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

HOLLENHORST

Acting P. J.

We concur:

MILLER

J.

CODRINGTON

J.

4