Signal Oil and Gas Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
390 F.2d 338·67 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2708·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7882
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 196821745_1California2,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

This case is before us pursuant to sections 10(e) and 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 160 (e), (f) (1964), which authorize our review of final orders of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board ruled on August 24, 1966, that the Signal Oil and Gas Company had violated sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a) (1), (a) (3) (1964), by discharging from its employ one Louis Evans. Signal has petitioned this court for review of the Board’s order implementing that ruling, asking that it be set aside, and in its answer the Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement of the order.

The controversy arises from incidents occurring in September 1965 in Bakersfield, California, where Signal has for some time operated a refinery and related petroleum facilities. Employees at the refinery itself were at that time represented by the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, Local 1-19, whose collective bargaining agreement with Signal was about to expire; negotiations between union and company representatives concerning the terms of a new agreement were in fact then being carried on. Signal also employed nine truck drivers,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.