Schulz

Schulz v. Sutter East Bay Hospitals CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 2015A136276California8,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 3/30/15 Schulz v. Sutter East Bay Hospitals CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RAFAEL SCHULZ,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A136276, A137208

v. SUTTER EAST BAY HOSPITALS, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG11590831) Defendant and Appellant.

This is a joint appeal following the trial court’s decisions to grant a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Sutter East Bay Hospitals (the Hospitals), but to deny their subsequent motion to recover attorney fees, in an employment action brought by plaintiff Rafael Schulz. Plaintiff, a former employee, sued the Hospitals for wrongful termination in violation of public policy and discrimination on the basis of gender and national origin. The Hospitals thereafter moved for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.