East West Bank v. Rio School District

Good Law
185 Cal. Rptr. 3d 676·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 274·235 Cal. App. 4th 742
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2015B238618ACalifornia3,890 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Public Contract Code section 7107 (section 7107) allows a public entity to withhold funds due a contractor when there are liens on the property or a good faith dispute concerning whether the work was properly performed. Here we conclude that a dispute over the contract price does not entitle a public entity to withhold funds due a contractor.

We disagree with Martin Brothers Construction, Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Construction, Inc. (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1401 [ 102 Cal.Rptr.3d 419 ] (Martin Brothers), which holds otherwise. We also conclude the doctrine of unclean hands does not apply to section 7107.

This case arises from a contract for the construction of a school. After the school was completed, the school district and its general contractor engaged in a decade-long legal battle. The result was a judgment for the contractor FTR International, Inc. (FTR), against the Rio School District (District) exceeding $9 million. District appeals.

We conclude the trial court properly assessed penalties against District because it did not timely release retained funds required by section 7107. [[/]]*

We also conclude [[/]]* the trial court erred in awarding fees for work not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.