In re Michael J. CA4/1

FACTS

On May 22, 2014, Michael unlawfully stole and took personal property from

Deyanira G.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel has identified as possible issues: (1) whether the trial court

erred in finding Michael was not unlawfully detained and therefore erred when it denied

his motion to suppress the evidence against him; (2) whether Michael's custody credits

were properly calculated; (3) whether the trial court properly calculated the maximum

term of confinement; and (4) whether the probation conditions imposed on Michael were

unconstitutionally vague or overbroad.

We granted Michael permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra,

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably

arguable appellate issues. Michael has been competently represented by counsel on…