Spennato

Spennato v. Dental Bd. of California CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2015B253560California6,375 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/1/15 Spennato v. Dental Bd. of California CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PETER SPENNATO, JR., B253560

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS140221) v.

DENTAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Robert O’Brien, Judge. Affirmed.

Norman L. Schafler for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Jim Ledakis, Assistant Attorney General, Marc D. Greenbaum and Morgan Malek, Deputy Attorneys General for Defendant and Respondent. Peter Spennato, Jr. (appellant) appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying his petition for writ of mandate. Through the writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.