Florez

Florez v. Yim CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2015B255766California2,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/2/15 Florez v. Yim CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

HERMINA FLOREZ et al., B255766

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC471407) v.

DONG YIM et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

William F. Fahey, Judge. Reversed.

Lipow & Harris and Jeffrey A. Lipow for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Law Offices of Alex Cha and Alex M. Cha for Defendants and Respondents.

_______________________________________ Appellants Hermina Florez and Claudia Zaragoza appeal from the trial court’s order reducing a judgment in their favor. Appellants sued the owners of a laundromat for wage and hour violations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.