City of San Jose v. Rodriguez CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2015H040317California5,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

The City of San Jose police officers who responded to a domestic disturbance call at the home of Edward V. Rodriguez determined that he was a danger to himself and others and had him transported to Santa Clara Valley Medical Center for 72-hour treatment and evaluation under Welfare and Institutions Code section 5150.1 The police officers also seized 12 firearms from the home pursuant to section 8102, subdivision (a), which requires confiscation of any firearms owned by or found in the possession or control of a person detained for an examination of his or her mental condition.

1 All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code unless otherwise indicated. The City of San Jose (City) subsequently filed a petition for disposition of the firearms in which the City requested a court order allowing forfeiture of the confiscated firearms pursuant to section 8102, subdivision (c). Edward V. Rodriguez’s wife, appellant Lori Rodriguez, opposed the petition and sought return of the firearms to her.2 After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court determined that return of the confiscated firearms to the Rodriguez home would be likely to result in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.