Sisneros

Sisneros v. SF Municipal Transp. Agency CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2015A139360California7,270 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 4/2/15 Sisneros v. SF Municipal Transp. Agency CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION

ANDREW SISNEROS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A139360

v. SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL (San Francisco County TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, et al., Super. Ct. No. CPF 11-511611) Defendants and Respondents.

Andrew Sisneros (Sisneros) was a bus driver for San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) until he was terminated from employment for dishonesty in connection with an investigation into tampering with an on-board “Drive- Cam” video system on an SFMTA bus. Sisneros challenged the decision by filing a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.1 After a hearing, the trial judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.