Spizzirri

Spizzirri v. MACH-1 Autogroup CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2015G049378California949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/3/15 Spizzirri v. MACH-1 Autogroup CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARC SPIZZIRRI,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G049378

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2009-00126504)

MACH-1 AUTOGROUP, et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from postjudgment orders of the Superior Court of Orange County, Jamoa A. Moberly, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Law Office of Frank W. Battaile and Frank W. Battaile for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gittler & Bradford and Stephen H. Marcus; Wolff Law Corporation and Joshua M. Wolff, for Defendants and Respondents. This appeal arises from postjudgment proceedings initiated by a judgment creditor to satisfy a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.