People v. Figge CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 6, 2015D066962California7,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 4/6/15 P. v. Figge CA4/

REDACTED

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D066962

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SWF1100774)

BRIAN KEITH FIGGE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Albert J.

Wojcik, Judge. Affirmed.

Brown White & Newhouse and Kenneth P. White for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General,

Peter Quon, Jr., and Parag Agrawal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Brian Figge appeals from a judgment convicting him of various sex offenses arising

from charges that he sexually molested Jane Doe 1 and Jane…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.