Designer Properties v. Ernest CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 7, 2015B256261California3,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/7/15 Designer Properties v. Ernest CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DESIGNER PROPERTIES, INC., B256261

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC468302) v.

DOROTHY M. ERNEST,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michelle Rosenblatt, Judge. Affirmed.

Lance G. Greene, APC for Defendant and Appellant.

The Ryan Law Firm, APC, Kelly F. Ryan for Plaintiff and Respondent. Defendant Dorothy Ernest appeals the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Designer Properties, Inc. on its complaint for quiet title based on adverse possession. On appeal, Ernest argues that Designer Properties did not meet the requirements for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.