Wofford

Wofford v. Thompson CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 7, 2015B253216California4,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/7/15 Wofford v. Thompson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

SEAN WOFFORD, B253216

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC481892) v.

BENJAMIN THOMPSON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mary H. Strobel, Judge. Affirmed.

Sean Wofford, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Michael N. Feuer, City Attorney, Amy Jo Field, Assistant City Attorney and Blithe S. Bock, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff Sean Wofford appeals the trial court’s judgment of dismissal following the successful demurrer of the City of Los Angeles and others to plaintiff’s cause of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.