Costen v. Pauline's Sportswear

Good Law
391 F.2d 81·11 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 93·1968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,370·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7989
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 21, 196821387_1California3,123 words

Opinion

Opinion

391 F.2d 81 Aleta G. COSTEN, Dyal E. Stone, Marie B. Stone, Patricia Ann Hobbs, Nick C. Howat and Margaret A. Howat, Appellants, v. PAULINE'S SPORTSWEAR, INC., Regal Accessories of New York, Robert C. Abild and Desda S. Abild, Appellees. No. 21387. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. February 21, 1968. William T. Richert, Fresno, Cal. (argued) of Fullerton, Lang & Richert, Fresno, Cal., for appellant. Thomas H. Greenwald, Beverly Hills, Cal. (argued), for appellee. Before HAMLEY, JERTBERG, and ELY, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge. 1 Appellants, plaintiffs below, challenge the District Court's dismissal of their original complaint and of their amended complaint. The original complaint consists of twelve counts, each appellant 1 being covered by three counts. The amended complaint consists of eight counts, in groups of two counts for each appellant. In both complaints there is no substantial difference in the allegations relating to each appellant. Thus, for convenience, the following discussion of the factual situation as alleged in the complaints will be confined to the first group of counts in each complaint, those relating to appellant Aleta G. Costen. 2 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.