People v. Perez CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Perez's appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings

below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal of the judgment, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel identifies the following possible, but

not arguable, issues for our review: (1) does Perez's guilty plea preclude him from

challenging his convictions for voluntary manslaughter and attempted murder on the

grounds of insufficiency of the evidence, self-defense, and tampered evidence; (2) were

his credits correctly calculated; (3) was he properly advised of his constitutional rights

and the consequences of pleading before entering his guilty plea; and (4) were his full

consecutive sentences and full consecutive enhancements unauthorized under section

1170.1?

We granted Perez permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but he

has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d

3 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably arguable

appellate issues. Perez has been…