Ghee

Ghee v. Pleasant CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 2015B253714California3,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 4/13/15 Ghee v. Pleasant CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

NORASTINE GHEE, B253714

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC477862) v.

ALEXIS PLEASANT,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard E. Rico, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of H. Michael Soroy, H. Michael Soroy, Peter C. Ver Halen and Kristin A. Ingulsrud for Plaintiff and Appellant. Manly, Stewart & Finaldi and Paul J. Sievers for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Plaintiff Norastine Ghee and her daughter defendant Alexis Pleasant owned two investment properties, holding title as joint tenants. After a dispute concerning the management of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.