Ghee
Ghee v. Pleasant CA2/1
Opinion
Opinion
Johnson, J.
Filed 4/13/15 Ghee v. Pleasant CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
NORASTINE GHEE, B253714
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC477862) v.
ALEXIS PLEASANT,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard E. Rico, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of H. Michael Soroy, H. Michael Soroy, Peter C. Ver Halen and Kristin A. Ingulsrud for Plaintiff and Appellant. Manly, Stewart & Finaldi and Paul J. Sievers for Defendant and Respondent. —————————— Plaintiff Norastine Ghee and her daughter defendant Alexis Pleasant owned two investment properties, holding title as joint tenants. After a dispute concerning the management of the…