Wunch

Wunch v. Richardson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2015D065544California4,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 4/14/15 Wunch v. Richardson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MARK A. WUNCH, D065544

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-

CU-OR-CTL)

DEANNA M. RICHARDSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, John S. Meyer,

Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Mele & Ros and Jose Ramon Ros for Plaintiff and Appellant.

The Law Office of Robin Jean Sassi and Robin Jean Sassi for Defendant and

Respondent.

Plaintiff Mark A. Wunch appeals the court's orders granting respondent DeAnna

M. Richardson's two separate ex parte applications: 1) ordering Wunch to accept a buyer's offer to purchase their jointly owned residential…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.