Miranda

Miranda v. Super. Ct. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2015G050870California2,011 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/13/15 Miranda v. Super. Ct. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

FRANK PAUL MIRANDA,

Petitioner,

v. G050870

THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE (Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00746722)

SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE

COUNTY OPINION

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

Original proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order of the Appellate Division of the Orange County Superior Court, Deborah C. Servino, Glenn R. Salter, and Richard Y. Lee, Judges. Petition granted. Chad R. Maddox for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney and John R. Maxfield, Deputy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.