Crosscreek Golf Club v. ANB Enterprises CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Cross-complainant Crosscreek Golf Club, Inc. (Crosscreek) appeals judgment
entered following the trial court granting cross-defendant ANB Enterprises, LLC’s
(ANB) motion in limine to dismiss Crosscreek’s cross-complaint on the ground
Crosscreek lacked standing to prosecute its cross-complaint. Crosscreek argues ANB’s
motion in limine was an improper substitute for a timely dispositive motion. Crosscreek
further argues it had standing to prosecute its cross-complaint and, even if it did not, the
trial court should have permitted Crosscreek to substitute in a real party in interest, rather
than dismiss the cross-complaint.
We conclude that, although the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on
ANB’s motion in limine to dismiss, the trial court erred in granting the motion and
dismissing Crosscreek’s cross-complaint on the ground Crosscreek did not have standing
to bring its cross-complaint. Even though the cross-complaint was filed shortly after
dissolution of Crosscreek as a corporation, under Corporations Code section 2010,
subdivision (a),1 Crosscreek “nevertheless continues to exist for the purpose of winding
up its affairs, prosecuting…