Perez

Perez v. Navman USA CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 15, 2015D066857California6,906 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/15/15 Perez v. Navman USA CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN PEREZ, D066857

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. RIC1100165,

RIC1100355)

NAVMAN USA, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. _____________________________________

BENJAMIN RAMIREZ et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. RIC 1100355)

v.

NAVMAN USA, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Matthew C.

Perantoni, Judge. Affirmed.

McNulty Law Firm, Peter J. McNulty and Brett L. Rosenthal for Plaintiffs and

Appellants Benjamin Ramirez and Celia Ramirez. Law Offices of Ryan & Associates,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.