Gurpreet Chahal v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
599 F. App'x 770
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 201511-73712California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

On February 10, 2015, the court granted the respondent’s unopposed motion to stay proceedings. On March 20, 2015, the respondent informed the court that Gurpreet Singh Chahal is not a candidate for prose-cutorial discretion, and requested that this case move forward. The stay of proceedings is hereby vacated.

Chahal, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency found Chahal not credible based on the omission of significant incidents and information from affidavits provided by his wife and mother in support of his claim. Substantial evidence supports this determination. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.