People v. Montes CA4/3

facts and procedural history of the case, and cited possible legal issues, but raised no specific issues, and asked this court to review the record to determine whether there were any arguable matters. Counsel submitted a declaration stating he reviewed the entire record. Counsel advised Montes he would soon file a Wende brief, provided him a copy of the brief and the appellate record, and advised Montes he could personally file a supplemental brief on his own behalf raising any issues he believed worthy of consideration. Counsel did not argue against his client or assert the appeal was frivolous. He did not move to withdraw as counsel but advised Montes he could ask the court to relieve him as counsel. We gave Montes 30 days to file a supplemental brief, but he has not responded. We have reviewed the record, found no arguable issues, and therefore affirm the judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Orange County District Attorney filed a criminal complaint alleging that on March 17, 2013, Montes possessed cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5) and committed the offense to benefit the Townsend Street criminal street gang (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (b); all…