People v. Bryson CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Donald Wallace Bryson shot and killed Armando Rodarte in a dispute
over a $40 debt. Defendant claimed he acted in self-defense. A jury convicted defendant
of second degree murder and possession of a firearm by a felon, and found the firearm
allegations true. (Pen. Code §§ 187, subd. (a); 12022.53, subds. (b), (c), (d) and 29800,
subd. (a).)1 2 The court sentenced defendant to a total sentence of 40 years to life.
On appeal, defendant contends the trial court should have allowed evidence that
the victim had been convicted of kidnapping and was on parole, showing his violent
character and motive. Defendant forfeited the claim of error because he did not argue
this theory to support the admission of such evidence. Furthermore, defendant’s self-
defense claim was supported by other independent evidence and the jury knew that the
victim had been recently released from prison. We affirm the judgment.
II
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Various witnesses and types of evidence afforded generally the same account of
what happened on January 2, 2013. At 5:54 a.m. that morning, Rodarte, the victim,