Doe

Doe v. Hsu CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2015E057754California6,686 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/16/15 Doe v. Hsu CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E057754

v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS120627)

CHRISTOPHER HSU, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Barry L. Plotkin,

Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice

pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Jane Doe, in pro. per.; Steptoe & Johnson, Seong H. Kim, J. Patrick Jacobs and

Ilhwan Justin Park for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Reed Smith, Margaret M. Grignon, Anne M. Grignon and Kasey J. Curtis for

Defendant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.