Doe
Doe v. Hsu CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2015E057754California6,686 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 4/16/15 Doe v. Hsu CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E057754
v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS120627)
CHRISTOPHER HSU, OPINION
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Barry L. Plotkin,
Judge. (Retired judge of the San Bernardino Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice
pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.
Jane Doe, in pro. per.; Steptoe & Johnson, Seong H. Kim, J. Patrick Jacobs and
Ilhwan Justin Park for Plaintiff and Appellant.