Beech-Nut

Environmental Law Foundation v. Beech-Nut

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2015A139821MCalifornia722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dondero, J.

Filed 4/16/15 Unmodified version attached

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

FOUNDATION,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A139821

v. (Alameda County BEECH-NUT NUTRITION CORP. et al., Super. Ct. No. RG11597384) Defendants and Appellants. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGEMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 17, 2015, be modified as follows: 1. On page 4, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, the reference to OEHHA should be to OSHA, so the sentence reads, “OSHA multiplied the OSHA PEL of 50 micrograms per cubic meter by 10 cubic meters (the amount OSHA determined workers breathed . . . .” 2. On page 7, in the next to the last sentence in the first full paragraph, the last two words in the sentence should be changed from “logged normal” to “log-normal,” so the sentence now reads: “If the geometric mean is lower than the arithmetic mean, this indicates that the data were log-normal.” 3. On page 13, in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.