Andreas Carlwig v. Sarodjiny Carlwig

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 201514-55671California271 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN RE A.L.C; E.R.S.C., Infants under No. 14-55671 the age of 16, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01506-

ANDREAS CARLWIG, ODW-SH

Petitioner-Appellee,

v. ORDER

SARODJINY CARLWIG,

Respondent-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 2, 2015—Pasadena, California

Filed April 17, 2015

Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges. IN RE A.L.C.

COUNSEL

Matthew A. Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson, and Truc Nguyen, McGuireWoods LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, Florida; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, Florida, for Defendant- Appellee.

Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman Wagner, Berkeley, California; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, California, for Amici…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.