Rashidi

Rashidi v. Moser CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2015B237476ACalifornia2,893 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/20/15 Rashidi v. Moser CA2/4 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

HAMID RASHIDI, B237476

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC392082) v.

FRANKLIN MOSER,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Reback, McAndrews, Kjar, Warford & Stockalper and Robert C. Reback; Cole Pedroza and Curtis A. Cole for Defendant and Appellant. Tucker Ellis, E. Todd Chayet, Rebecca A. Lefler, Corena G. Larimer; and Fred J. Hiestand as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Balan & Speilberger, Daniel Balaban, Andrew J. Spielberger;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.