Capistrano Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of San Juan Capistrano

Bad Law
186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 362·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 330·235 Cal. App. 4th 1493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 2015G048969California10,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Southern California is a “semi-desert with a desert heart.” Visionary engineers and scientists have done a remarkable job of making our home habitable, and too many of us south of the Tehachapis never give a thought to its remarkable reclamation. In his brilliant — if opinionated — classic Cadillac Desert, the late Marc Reisner laments how little appreciation there is of “how difficult it will be just to hang on to the beachhead they have made.”

In this case we deal with parties who have an acute appreciation of how tenuous the beachhead is, and how desperately we all must fight to protect it. But they disagree about what steps are allowable — or required — to accomplish that task. We are called upon to determine not what is the right — or even the more reasonable — approach to the beachhead’s preservation, but what is the one chosen by the state’s voters.

We hope there are future scientists, engineers, and legislators with the wisdom to envision and enact water plans to keep our beloved Cadillac Desert habitable. But that is not the court’s mandate. Our job — and it is daunting enough — is solely to determine what water plans the voters and legislators…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.