People v. Jefferson CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has not identified any reasonably arguable

issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel has not identified any possible, but not arguable

issues as is ordinarily required by Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. However,

we have reviewed the entire record as mandated by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders. We have not discovered any reasonably arguable issue for reversal on appeal.

Competent counsel has represented Jefferson on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

BENKE, J.

3